GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 5470

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 5470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 5470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 410M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 33W instead of 294W, a 261W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $83 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5470

2009

Why buy it

✅11.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($83 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌790.9% higher power demand at 294W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 5470 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 410M instead at 271 vs 268, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 410M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 5470 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 5470 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 410M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 5470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 410M

The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

Radeon HD 5470

The Radeon HD 5470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 268 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the Radeon HD 5470 reaches 268 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5470 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5470). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5470).

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 5470
G3D Mark Score	271+1%	268
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1600 ×2+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	2.32 TFLOPS ×2+157%
ROPs	8	32 ×2+300%
TMUs	24	80 ×2+233%
L1 Cache	192 KB	320 KB+67%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 410M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5470 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 5470
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5470. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5470) — the GeForce 410M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 5470
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 5470's 294W — a 159.6% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 5470). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 5470
TDP	33W-89%	294W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	8.2+811%	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 5470
MSRP	—	$83
Codename	GM108	Hemlock
Release	March 13 2015	November 18 2009
Ranking	#847	#651

Search GeForce 410M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 5470 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.