GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 8330

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 8330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 8330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9650M GS

2012

Why buy it

✅3.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 30W instead of 175W, a 145W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
298% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8330

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 305.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.5 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9650M GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌483.3% higher power demand at 175W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9650M GS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8330 instead at 275 vs 270, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9650M GS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8330 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 305.4% (5.5 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 9650M GS has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 8330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9650M GS

The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

Radeon HD 8330

The Radeon HD 8330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 275 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9650M GS scores 270 and the Radeon HD 8330 reaches 275 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GS is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8330 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 1,120 (Radeon HD 8330).

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	Radeon HD 8330
G3D Mark Score	270	275+2%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	768	1120+46%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9650M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8330 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	Radeon HD 8330
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8330.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	Radeon HD 8330
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9650M GS draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8330's 175W — a 141.5% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8330). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	Radeon HD 8330
TDP	30W-83%	175W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.0+463%	1.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9650M GS came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 8330 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8330 was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 5.5 (Radeon HD 8330) — the Radeon HD 8330 offers 292.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9650M GS (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 9650M GS	Radeon HD 8330
MSRP	$199	$50-75%
Performance per Dollar	1.4	5.5+293%
Codename	N13E-GE	Cypress
Release	March 22 2012	February 25 2010
Ranking	#690	#724

Search GeForce 9650M GS on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8330 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.