GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 7400G

NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GS

2012Core: 790 MHzBoost: 835 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7400G

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 7400G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 7400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 7400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9650M GS

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 43W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7400G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 298% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7400G

2025

Why buy it

  • 1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $149 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 293.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 43.3% higher power demand at 43W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7400G is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9650M GS instead at 270 vs 267, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7400G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7400G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 293.6% (5.3 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 9650M GS vs Radeon HD 7400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GS

The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7400G

The Radeon HD 7400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 267 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9650M GS scores 270 and the Radeon HD 7400G reaches 267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9650M GS is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7400G uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7400G). Boost clocks: 835 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
G3D Mark Score
270+1%
267
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
768
1792+133%
Boost Clock
835 MHz
2300 MHz+175%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9650M GS gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7400G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GS and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7400G.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7400G). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9650M GS) vs None (Radeon HD 7400G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 7400G).

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
Encoder
No NVENC (G84)
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9650M GS draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7400G's 43W — a 35.6% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7400G). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
TDP
30W-30%
43W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
9.0+45%
6.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 9650M GS came in at $199, while the Radeon HD 7400G launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7400G was 74.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 9650M GS) vs 5.3 (Radeon HD 7400G) — the Radeon HD 7400G offers 278.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7400G (2025 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 9650M GSRadeon HD 7400G
MSRP
$199
$50-75%
Performance per Dollar
1.4
5.3+279%
Codename
N13E-GE
Navi 33
Release
March 22 2012
August 8 2025
Ranking
#690
#229

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.