A6-7480
VS
Athlon 64 FX-72

A6-7480 vs Athlon 64 FX-72

AMD

A6-7480

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-72

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7480 is positioned at rank 597 and the Athlon 64 FX-72 is on rank 1100, so the A6-7480 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7480

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10432%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9857%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7157%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2156%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1708%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1494%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
856%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
845%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
769%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
769%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
760%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
740%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
729%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
727%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
720%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
96%
#597
A6-7480
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
100%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
100%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
99%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
99%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-72

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
138540%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
130907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
95049%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
28634%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
22681%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
19842%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
11364%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
11216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10212%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10212%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
10097%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9825%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9688%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9648%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9561%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
100%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
96%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
93%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
87%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
85%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
83%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
81%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
80%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
75%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
70%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
65%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
64%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
62%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
56%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
56%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-7480 (2018) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-7480Athlon 64 FX-72
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-72 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-7480Athlon 64 FX-72
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-7480 and Athlon 64 FX-72

AMD

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-72

The Athlon 64 FX-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,794 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the A6-7480 and Athlon 64 FX-72 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-72 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the A6-7480. The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-72 uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Athlon 64 FX-72's 1,794 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-72.

FeatureA6-7480Athlon 64 FX-72
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+36%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB
Process
28 nm-69%
90 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,793
1,794
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-72 uses F (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7480 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 FX-72 — the A6-7480 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7480 supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7480) vs 0 (Athlon 64 FX-72) — the A6-7480 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7480) and AMD F (1207) (Athlon 64 FX-72).

FeatureA6-7480Athlon 64 FX-72
Socket
FM2+
F
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
2133+106550%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
32
16 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-7480) / not specified (Athlon 64 FX-72). The A6-7480 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon 64 FX-72 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureA6-7480Athlon 64 FX-72
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true