Athlon 5350 vs Core 2 Quad Q8200
Athlon 5350
Core 2 Quad Q8200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 5350 is positioned at rank 564 and the Core 2 Quad Q8200 is on rank 1028, so the Athlon 5350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 5350
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($36) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+139%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($36) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 5350 and Core 2 Quad Q8200
Athlon 5350
The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Quad Q8200
The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 5350 and Core 2 Quad Q8200 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8200 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the Core 2 Quad Q8200's 1,807 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8200.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.05 GHz | 2.33 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | 2.33 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Yorkfield (2007−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,796 | 1,807 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 223 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 708 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5350 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5350 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — the Athlon 5350 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5350 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5350) vs 2 (Core 2 Quad Q8200). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 5350) vs 16 (Core 2 Quad Q8200) — the Core 2 Quad Q8200 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 8 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 5350) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q8200). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8200 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 5350 launched at $55 MSRP, while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 debuted at $224. At current prices ($15 vs $36), the Athlon 5350 is $21 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5350 delivers 119.7 pts/$ vs 50.2 pts/$ for the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — making the Athlon 5350 the 81.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Quad Q8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-75% | $224 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-58% | $36 |
| Performance per Dollar | 119.7+138% | 50.2 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 5350 and Core 2 Quad Q8200
