Athlon 5350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-66

Athlon 5350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-66 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5350

4 / 4

1,796

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-66

2 / 2

1,808

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-66 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-66: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5350

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while Turion 64 X2 TL-66 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-66.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,796 vs 1,808).
❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-66 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-66

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5350.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-66 better than Athlon 5350?

Yes. Turion 64 X2 TL-66 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-66 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-66 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-66 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 X2 TL-66 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 5350 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-66 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 X2 TL-66

The Turion 64 X2 TL-66 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,808 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Turion 64 X2 TL-66 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-66 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 X2 TL-66. The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-66 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-66's 1,808 — a 0.7% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-66.

Feature	Athlon 5350	Turion 64 X2 TL-66
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.05 GHz	2.3 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	—
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,796	1,808
Geekbench 6 Single	223	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	708	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon 5350) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-66). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-66 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.