A6-7470K vs Athlon 5350

A6-7470K vs Athlon 5350 Performance Spectrum

A6-7470K

2 / 2

1,799

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 5350

4 / 4

1,796

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7470K vs Athlon 5350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7470K vs Athlon 5350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7470K

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Athlon 5350

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,796 vs 1,799).
❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while A6-7470K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7470K better than Athlon 5350?

Yes. A6-7470K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-7470K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7470K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7470K is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7470K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7470K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7470K vs Athlon 5350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7470K

The A6-7470K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7470K packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon 5350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A6-7470K versus 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 — a 64.5% clock advantage for the A6-7470K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). The A6-7470K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 5350 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7470K scores 1,799 against the Athlon 5350's 1,796 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-7470K.

Feature	A6-7470K	Athlon 5350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+95%	2.05 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+80%	2.05 GHz
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2048 kB+100%
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,799	1,796
Geekbench 6 Single	—	223
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	708

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7470K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 5350 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7470K versus 1600 on the Athlon 5350 — the A6-7470K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7470K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6-7470K) vs 1 (Athlon 5350). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7470K) vs 8 (Athlon 5350) — the A6-7470K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7470K) and AM1 (Athlon 5350).

Feature	A6-7470K	Athlon 5350
Socket	FM2+	AM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+33%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32+100%	16
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-7470K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7470K) and Radeon R3 Graphics (Athlon 5350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7470K rivals Pentium G4400; Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.