A6-7470K
VS
Core 2 Quad Q8200

A6-7470K vs Core 2 Quad Q8200

AMD

A6-7470K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8200

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7470K is positioned at rank 595 and the Core 2 Quad Q8200 is on rank 1028, so the A6-7470K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7470K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10397%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9825%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7133%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2149%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1702%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1489%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
853%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
842%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
766%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
766%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
758%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
737%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
727%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
724%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
718%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#595
A6-7470K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
99%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
99%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
98%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
98%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38626%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36498%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26501%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7984%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6324%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5532%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3169%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3127%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2847%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2847%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2815%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2739%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2701%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2690%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2666%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
95%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
100%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
99%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
99%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
96%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
96%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
94%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
94%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
94%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
93%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
93%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-7470K (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-7470KCore 2 Quad Q8200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($36)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-7470KCore 2 Quad Q8200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($36)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-7470K and Core 2 Quad Q8200

AMD

A6-7470K

The A6-7470K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8200

The Core 2 Quad Q8200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,807 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A6-7470K packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q8200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A6-7470K versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — a 52.8% clock advantage for the A6-7470K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The A6-7470K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses Yorkfield (2007−2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7470K scores 1,799 against the Core 2 Quad Q8200's 1,807 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q8200.

FeatureA6-7470KCore 2 Quad Q8200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+72%
2.33 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+59%
2.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
4 MB (total)+300%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
1,799
1,807
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7470K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7470K versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Quad Q8200 — the A6-7470K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7470K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA6-7470KCore 2 Quad Q8200
Socket
FM2+
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
2133+71000%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32
8 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-7470K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A6-7470K) vs VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q8200). The A6-7470K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core 2 Quad Q8200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q8200 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-7470K rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureA6-7470KCore 2 Quad Q8200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop