A6-7470K
VS
Atom x5-E3940

A6-7470K vs Atom x5-E3940

AMD

A6-7470K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Atom x5-E3940

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-7470K is positioned at rank 595 and the Atom x5-E3940 is on rank 337, so the Atom x5-E3940 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7470K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10397%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9825%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7133%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2149%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1702%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1489%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
853%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
842%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
766%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
766%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
758%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
737%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
727%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
724%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
718%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#595
A6-7470K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
99%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
99%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
98%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
98%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-E3940

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
97%
#325
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
485%
#326
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
478%
#327
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
438%
#328
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
436%
#329
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
432%
#331
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
418%
#332
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
400%
#333
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
400%
#334
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
389%
#337
Atom x5-E3940
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-7470K leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom x5-E3940 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-7470KAtom x5-E3940
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-7470KAtom x5-E3940
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-7470K and Atom x5-E3940

AMD

A6-7470K

The A6-7470K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Atom x5-E3940

The Atom x5-E3940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,816 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-7470K packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-E3940 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-E3940 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A6-7470K versus 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3940 — a 75.9% clock advantage for the A6-7470K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-7470K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x5-E3940 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7470K scores 1,799 against the Atom x5-E3940's 1,816 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x5-E3940.

FeatureA6-7470KAtom x5-E3940
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+122%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+131%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB (total)+100%
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,799
1,816
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7470K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x5-E3940 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7470K versus DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3940 — the A6-7470K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7470K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7470K) vs 6 (Atom x5-E3940) — the A6-7470K offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7470K) and Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3940).

FeatureA6-7470KAtom x5-E3940
Socket
FM2+
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2133+71000%
DDR3L-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32
8 GB+26214300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+167%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-7470K) / not specified (Atom x5-E3940). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7470K) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Atom x5-E3940) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7470K rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureA6-7470KAtom x5-E3940
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true