Athlon 5350 vs E2-9000

Athlon 5350 vs E2-9000 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5350

4 / 4

1,796

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E2-9000

2 / 2

1,787

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5350 vs E2-9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5350 vs E2-9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5350

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while E2-9000 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike E2-9000.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while E2-9000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.

E2-9000

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,787 vs 1,796).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5350.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-9000 better than Athlon 5350?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-9000 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5350 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-9000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-9000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $55 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 5350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-9000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 5350 vs E2-9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the E2-9000 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the E2-9000 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the E2-9000 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the E2-9000's 1,787 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 5350.

Feature	Athlon 5350	E2-9000
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.05 GHz	2.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.05 GHz+14%	1.8 GHz
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,796	1,787
Geekbench 6 Single	223	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	708	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5350 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-9000 uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 5350	E2-9000
Socket	AM1	BGA
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Athlon 5350) / not specified (E2-9000). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the E2-9000 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.