Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs E2-9000

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs E2-9000 Performance Spectrum

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

2 / 2

1,797

+0.6%

1,787

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs E2-9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs E2-9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while E2-9000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

E2-9000

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,787 vs 1,797).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3000 better than E2-9000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-9000 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3000 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T3000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that E2-9000 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-9000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs E2-9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn-1M (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $69.

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and E2-9000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 — a 20% clock advantage for the E2-9000. The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses the Penryn-1M (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-9000 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 scores 1,797 against the E2-9000's 1,787 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3000.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3000	E2-9000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.2 GHz+22%
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Penryn-1M (2009)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,797	1,787

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-9000 uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.