Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs Celeron M 723

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs Celeron M 723 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs Celeron M 723: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,174 vs 1,180).

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Celeron Dual-Core T3100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 723 better than Celeron Dual-Core T3100?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 723 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 723 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs Celeron M 723 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3100

The Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,174 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T3100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 723 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron Dual-Core T3100 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3100 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T3100. Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3100 scores 1,174 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron M 723.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3100	Celeron M 723
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+58%	1.2 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,174	1,180
Geekbench 6 Single	—	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core T3100) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3100	Celeron M 723
Socket	PGA478	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T3100) vs None (Celeron M 723). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3100 targets Budget, Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3100 rivals Pentium T4200; Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.