Celeron N2808 vs Pentium T2310

Intel

Celeron N2808

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.25 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium T2310

35 WW2007
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N2808 vs Pentium T2310 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2808 vs Pentium T2310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2808 vs Pentium T2310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2808

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium T2310 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T2310 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (615 vs 625).

Pentium T2310

2007

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N2808 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2808 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T2310 better than Celeron N2808?
Yes. Pentium T2310 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium T2310 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T2310 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium T2310 is the better buy right now. Pentium T2310 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N2808 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2808 vs Pentium T2310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N2808

The Celeron N2808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium T2310

The Pentium T2310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron N2808 is built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N2808 scores 615 against the Pentium T2310's 625 — a 1.6% lead for the Pentium T2310. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2808 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2310.

FeatureCeleron N2808Pentium T2310
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.25 GHz
Base Clock
1.58 GHz+8%
1.46 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
615
625+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2808 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T2310 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2808 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium T2310 — the Celeron N2808 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2808) vs 2 (Pentium T2310). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2808) vs 0 (Pentium T2310) — the Celeron N2808 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron N2808Pentium T2310
Socket
FCBGA1170
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2808) vs VT-x is missing (Pentium T2310). The Celeron N2808 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium T2310 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2808 targets Mobile, Pentium T2310 targets Mobile.

FeatureCeleron N2808Pentium T2310
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x is missing
Target Use
Mobile
Mobile