Celeron N2820
VS
Celeron B840

Celeron N2820 vs Celeron B840

Intel

Celeron N2820

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.39 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron B840

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2820 is positioned at rank 259 and the Celeron B840 is on rank 1028, so the Celeron N2820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2820

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#247
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
415%
#248
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
409%
#249
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
375%
#250
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#251
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
370%
#253
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
357%
#254
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#255
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
342%
#256
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
333%
#259
Celeron N2820
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B840

#1016
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2370%
#1017
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2335%
#1018
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2144%
#1019
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2134%
#1020
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2115%
#1022
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2042%
#1023
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1958%
#1024
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1955%
#1025
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1902%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
93%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron B840 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N2820 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron N2820Celeron B840
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2820Celeron B840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2820 and Celeron B840

Intel

Celeron N2820

The Celeron N2820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,061 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Celeron B840

The Celeron B840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,065 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2820 and Celeron B840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.39 GHz on the Celeron N2820 versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron B840 — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N2820 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Celeron N2820 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron B840 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2820 scores 1,061 against the Celeron B840's 1,065 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron B840. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 450, a 68.7% lead for the Celeron B840 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 400 vs 790 (65.5% advantage for the Celeron B840). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2820 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B840.

FeatureCeleron N2820Celeron B840
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.39 GHz+26%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.13 GHz+12%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,061
1,065
Geekbench 6 Single
220
450+105%
Geekbench 6 Multi
400
790+98%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2820 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron B840 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2820 versus 1333 on the Celeron B840 — the Celeron B840 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B840 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2820) vs 16 (Celeron B840) — the Celeron B840 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2820) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Celeron B840).

FeatureCeleron N2820Celeron B840
Socket
FCBGA1170
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2820) vs true (Celeron B840). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2820) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2820 targets Netbook, Celeron B840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron N2820 rivals AMD A6-6310; Celeron B840 rivals Pentium B940.

FeatureCeleron N2820Celeron B840
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Netbook
Budget