Celeron N3050 vs Celeron N3350

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3050 vs Celeron N3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3050 vs Celeron N3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3050

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N3350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (440 vs 450).

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Celeron N3050 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3350 better than Celeron N3050?

Yes. Celeron N3350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3350 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3050 vs Celeron N3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3050

The Celeron N3050 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,099 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3050 and Celeron N3350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N3050 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron N3050 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N3350 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3050 scores 1,099 against the Celeron N3350's 1,112 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron N3350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 221 vs 250, a 12.3% lead for the Celeron N3350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 440 vs 450 (2.2% advantage for the Celeron N3350). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N3050	Celeron N3350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	2.4 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+45%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,099	1,112+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	221	250+13%
Geekbench 6 Multi	440	450+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3050 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3350 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron N3050 versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 — the Celeron N3350 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3050) vs 6 (Celeron N3350) — the Celeron N3350 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Braswell SoC (Celeron N3050) and SoC (Celeron N3350).

Feature	Celeron N3050	Celeron N3350
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	LPDDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	6+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / EPT (Celeron N3050) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Celeron N3050) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Celeron N3350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3050 targets Netbook, Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3050 rivals AMD E2-7110; Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

Feature	Celeron N3050	Celeron N3350
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)	Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x / EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Netbook	Entry Level Laptop/NUC