Celeron N3450 vs Celeron M 560
Celeron N3450
Celeron M 560
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N3450 is positioned at rank 122 and the Celeron M 560 is on rank 819, so the Celeron N3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3450
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 560
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron N3450 | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron N3450 | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N3450 and Celeron M 560
Celeron N3450
The Celeron N3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,981 points. Launch price was $107.
Celeron M 560
The Celeron M 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,008 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 560 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N3450 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron N3450 versus 2.13 GHz on the Celeron M 560 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Celeron N3450. The Celeron N3450 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M 560 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3450 scores 1,981 against the Celeron M 560's 2,008 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron M 560.
| Feature | Celeron N3450 | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+300% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+3% | 2.13 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,981 | 2,008+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3450 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 560 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron N3450 versus 667 on the Celeron M 560 — the Celeron N3450 supports 113% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N3450 supports up to 8 of RAM compared to 4 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron N3450) vs 0 (Celeron M 560) — the Celeron N3450 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1296 (Celeron N3450) and GL960,GM965 (Celeron M 560).
| Feature | Celeron N3450 | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400+260% | 667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8+100% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3450) vs false (Celeron M 560). The Celeron N3450 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Celeron M 560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3450 rivals AMD A4-9120; Celeron M 560 rivals Mobile Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Celeron N3450 | Celeron M 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 500 | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | false |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron N3450 and Celeron M 560
