Celeron N4020C
VS
A4-6320

Celeron N4020C vs A4-6320

Intel

Celeron N4020C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2021
VS
AMD

A4-6320

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4020C is positioned at rank 575 and the A4-6320 is on rank 675, so the Celeron N4020C offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4020C

#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
100%
#563
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
763%
#564
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
752%
#565
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
691%
#566
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
687%
#567
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
681%
#569
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
658%
#570
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
631%
#571
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
630%
#572
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
613%
#575
Celeron N4020C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12210%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11537%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8377%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2524%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1999%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1749%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1002%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
988%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
900%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
900%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
890%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
866%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
854%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
850%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
843%
#675
A4-6320
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#676
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#677
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#678
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
100%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
97%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4020C (2021) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N4020CA4-6320
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A4-6320 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N4020CA4-6320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4020C and A4-6320

Intel

Celeron N4020C

The Celeron N4020C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A4-6320

The A4-6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4020C and A4-6320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020C versus 4 GHz on the A4-6320 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A4-6320 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The A4-6320 is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4020C scores 1,537 against the A4-6320's 1,532 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N4020C.

FeatureCeleron N4020CA4-6320
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+245%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,537
1,532
Geekbench 6 Single
433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4020C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the A4-6320 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4020CA4-6320
Socket
FCBGA1090
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4020C) / AMD-V (A4-6320). The A4-6320 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Celeron N4020C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6320 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6320 rivals Pentium G3250.

FeatureCeleron N4020CA4-6320
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8370D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop