Celeron N4100 vs Core i7-4610Y

Intel

Celeron N4100

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-4610Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N4100 vs Core i7-4610Y Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4100 vs Core i7-4610Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4100 vs Core i7-4610Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4100

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4610Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-4610Y

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Celeron N4100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,446 vs 2,453).
  • 8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4100 better than Core i7-4610Y?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-4610Y is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4100 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron N4100 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4100 vs Core i7-4610Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N4100

The Celeron N4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,453 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i7-4610Y

The Core i7-4610Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $415.

Processing Power

The Celeron N4100 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4610Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N4100 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N4100 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-4610Y — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610Y (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron N4100 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-4610Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4100 scores 2,453 against the Core i7-4610Y's 2,446 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N4100. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N4100Core i7-4610Y
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
1.7 GHz+55%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Goldmont Plus (2017)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,453
2,446
Geekbench 6 Single
700
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,350
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4100 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4100Core i7-4610Y
Socket
FCBGA1090
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4100) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4610Y). The Core i7-4610Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Celeron N4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4610Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet.

FeatureCeleron N4100Core i7-4610Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Ultrabook/Tablet