Celeron N4100 vs FX-9800P

Celeron N4100 vs FX-9800P Performance Spectrum

Celeron N4100

4 / 4

2,453

0.0%

2,460

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4100 vs FX-9800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4100 vs FX-9800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 15W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-9800P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,453 vs 2,460).

FX-9800P

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N4100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌150% higher power demand at 15W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-9800P better than Celeron N4100?

Yes. FX-9800P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-9800P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9800P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-9800P is the better buy right now. FX-9800P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N4100 vs FX-9800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4100

The Celeron N4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,453 points. Launch price was $107.

FX-9800P

The FX-9800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,460 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4100 and FX-9800P share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N4100 versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-9800P — a 40% clock advantage for the FX-9800P (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron N4100 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-9800P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4100 scores 2,453 against the FX-9800P's 2,460 — a 0.3% lead for the FX-9800P.

Feature	Celeron N4100	FX-9800P
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.7 GHz+145%
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB (per module)
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,453	2,460

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4100 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.