Celeron N4100 vs Pentium Silver N5000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4100 vs Pentium Silver N5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4100 vs Pentium Silver N5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4100

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium Silver N5000

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,442 vs 2,453).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4100 better than Pentium Silver N5000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Silver N5000 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4100 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4100 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4100 vs Pentium Silver N5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4100

The Celeron N4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,453 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium Silver N5000

The Pentium Silver N5000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,442 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4100 and Pentium Silver N5000 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N4100 versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium Silver N5000 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Pentium Silver N5000 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). Both are built on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron N4100 scores 2,453 against the Pentium Silver N5000's 2,442 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N4100. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N4100	Pentium Silver N5000
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.7 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark	2,453	2,442