Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E5606

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E5606 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E5606: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4100

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 80W, a 74W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E5606

2011

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,443 vs 2,453).
❌1233.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4100 better than Xeon E5606?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5606 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N4100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4100 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E5606 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4100

The Celeron N4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,453 points. Launch price was $107.

Xeon E5606

The Xeon E5606 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,443 points. Launch price was $46.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4100 and Xeon E5606 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N4100 versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon E5606 — a 179.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N4100 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron N4100 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5606 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4100 scores 2,453 against the Xeon E5606's 2,443 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N4100. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4100 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5606.

Feature	Celeron N4100	Xeon E5606
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+1746%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.13 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	4 MB	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,453	2,443

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4100 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5606 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.