Celeron U3400 vs Atom D2500
Celeron U3400
Atom D2500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron U3400 is positioned at rank 1172 and the Atom D2500 is on rank 79, so the Atom D2500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron U3400
Performance Per Dollar Atom D2500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron U3400 | Atom D2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron U3400 | Atom D2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+698%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($42) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron U3400 and Atom D2500
Celeron U3400
The Celeron U3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 575 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom D2500
The Atom D2500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 605 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron U3400 and Atom D2500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Celeron U3400 versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2500 — a 185.6% clock advantage for the Atom D2500 (base: 1.06 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Celeron U3400 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom D2500 uses Cedarview (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron U3400 scores 575 against the Atom D2500's 605 — a 5.1% lead for the Atom D2500. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron U3400 vs 0 kB on the Atom D2500.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Atom D2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 1.87 GHz+2571% |
| Base Clock | 1.06 GHz | 1.86 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere (2010−2011) | Cedarview (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 575 | 605+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron U3400 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom D2500 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Atom D2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
The Atom D2500 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3600), while the Celeron U3400 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Atom D2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3600 |
Value Analysis
The Celeron U3400 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Atom D2500 debuted at $42.
| Feature | Celeron U3400 | Atom D2500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $42-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5 | — |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron U3400 and Atom D2500
