PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron U3600 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron U3600 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron U3600

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 18W instead of 65W, a 47W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (625 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on BGA1288, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1216.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 2637.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1288 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
46.3% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$134 MSRP
❌261.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron U3600?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1216.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3904.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1216.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 3904.6% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 46.3% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1216.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2637.9% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 4.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of BGA1288, 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron U3600 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron U3600

The Celeron U3600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron U3600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Celeron U3600 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 191.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron U3600 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron U3600 scores 625 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 190.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron U3600 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Celeron U3600	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	4.6 GHz+4500%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+108%
L3 Cache	2 MB	20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache	512 kB	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	32 nm	Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture	Westmere (2010−2011)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	625	25,029+3905%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron U3600 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron U3600	Core i5-13400F
Socket	BGA1288	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	192 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron U3600) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Celeron U3600	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron U3600 was priced at $134, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($134 vs $196), Celeron U3600 was $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron U3600 delivers 4.7 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 185.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron U3600	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$134-32%	$196
Performance per Dollar	4.7	127.7+2617%
Release Date	2011	2023

Search Celeron U3600 on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.