Celeron U3600
VS
Turion 64 ML-44

Celeron U3600 vs Turion 64 ML-44

Intel

Celeron U3600

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-44

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron U3600 is positioned at rank 1213 and the Turion 64 ML-44 is on rank 846, so the Turion 64 ML-44 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron U3600

#1201
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6296%
#1202
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6204%
#1203
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5695%
#1204
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5670%
#1205
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5618%
#1207
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5425%
#1208
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5202%
#1209
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5193%
#1210
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5054%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
100%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
98%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
98%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
98%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
95%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
95%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
92%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
89%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
87%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
87%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
86%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
86%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-44

#834
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1365%
#835
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1345%
#836
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1234%
#837
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1229%
#838
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1218%
#840
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1176%
#841
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1127%
#842
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1126%
#843
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1095%
#846
Turion 64 ML-44
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
98%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion 64 ML-44 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron U3600 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron U3600Turion 64 ML-44
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron U3600Turion 64 ML-44
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($134)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron U3600 and Turion 64 ML-44

Intel

Celeron U3600

The Celeron U3600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Turion 64 ML-44

The Turion 64 ML-44 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 645 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron U3600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-44 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron U3600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Celeron U3600 versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-44 — a 184% clock advantage for the Turion 64 ML-44. The Celeron U3600 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron U3600 scores 625 against the Turion 64 ML-44's 645 — a 3.1% lead for the Turion 64 ML-44. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron U3600 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-44.

FeatureCeleron U3600Turion 64 ML-44
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.1 GHz
2.4 GHz+2300%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-64%
90 nm
Architecture
Westmere (2010−2011)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
625
645+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron U3600 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-44 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron U3600Turion 64 ML-44
Socket
BGA1288
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0