
Core 2 Duo E4400 vs Core 2 Duo E8335

Core 2 Duo E4400

Core 2 Duo E8335
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4400 is positioned at rank 1001 and the Core 2 Duo E8335 is on rank 1196, so the Core 2 Duo E4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4400
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4400 | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E4400 | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+150%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4400 and Core 2 Duo E8335

Core 2 Duo E4400
The Core 2 Duo E4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,095 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Duo E8335
The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E4400 and Core 2 Duo E8335 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4400 versus 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 — a 73% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4400 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.933 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E4400 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4400 scores 1,095 against the Core 2 Duo E8335's 1,094 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4400.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4400 | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+115% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.933 GHz+47% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB (total)+200% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,095 | 1,094 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 208 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E4400 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4400 | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: None (Core 2 Duo E4400) / not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4400 rivals Athlon II X2 240.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4400 | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | None | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E4400 launched at $113 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8335 debuted at $200. At current prices ($20 vs $50), the Core 2 Duo E4400 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4400 delivers 54.8 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8335 — making the Core 2 Duo E4400 the 85.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E4400 | Core 2 Duo E8335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $113-44% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.8+150% | 21.9 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











