Core 2 Duo E4600
VS
Core 2 Solo SU3300

Core 2 Duo E4600 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3300

1 Cores1 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E4600 is positioned at rank 1006 and the Core 2 Solo SU3300 is on rank 1211, so the Core 2 Duo E4600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
33554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
31705%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23020%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6935%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5493%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4806%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2752%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2716%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2473%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2473%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2380%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2346%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2337%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2316%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
100%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
99%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
98%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
97%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
97%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
97%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
96%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
96%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
93%
#1020
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
93%
#1021
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Solo SU3300

#1199
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6164%
#1200
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6074%
#1201
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5576%
#1202
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5550%
#1203
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5500%
#1205
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5311%
#1206
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5092%
#1207
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5084%
#1208
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4947%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
100%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
98%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
96%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
96%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
93%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
93%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
90%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
88%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
86%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
85%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
85%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E4600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Solo SU3300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Solo SU3300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($9.6)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E4600 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 81% cheaper ($9.6 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Solo SU3300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+416%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($9.6)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E4600 and Core 2 Solo SU3300

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4600

The Core 2 Duo E4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Solo SU3300

The Core 2 Solo SU3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,247 points. Launch price was $262.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E4600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core 2 Duo E4600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4600 versus 1.2 GHz on the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4600. The Core 2 Duo E4600 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E4600 scores 1,235 against the Core 2 Solo SU3300's 1,247 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Solo SU3300.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Solo SU3300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+100%
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
3 MB+50%
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Allendale (2006−2009)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,235
1,247
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E4600 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E4600 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E4600) vs 1 (Core 2 Solo SU3300). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Solo SU3300
Socket
LGA775
BGA956
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E4600) / VT-x (Core 2 Solo SU3300). Primary use case: Core 2 Solo SU3300 targets Mobile.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Solo SU3300
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E4600 launched at $133 MSRP, while the Core 2 Solo SU3300 debuted at $262. At current prices ($9.6 vs $50), the Core 2 Duo E4600 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E4600 delivers 128.6 pts/$ vs 24.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Solo SU3300 — making the Core 2 Duo E4600 the 135% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E4600Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP
$133-49%
$262
Avg Price (30d)
$9.6-81%
$50
Performance per Dollar
128.6+416%
24.9
Release Date
2007
2008