Core 2 Duo E6300
VS
E-350

Core 2 Duo E6300 vs E-350

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2006
VS
AMD

E-350

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6300 is positioned at rank 1058 and the E-350 is on rank 854, so the E-350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
48179%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
45524%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
33054%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9958%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6900%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3952%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3900%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3417%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3355%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3325%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
100%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
99%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
98%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
98%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
94%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
91%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
91%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
89%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
88%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
87%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
87%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
83%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
77%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E-350

#842
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1398%
#843
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1378%
#844
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1265%
#845
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1259%
#846
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1248%
#848
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1205%
#849
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1155%
#850
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1153%
#851
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1122%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#863
Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#867
Core i7-1160G7
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E6300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E-350 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo E6300E-350
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E6300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 67% cheaper ($5 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo E6300E-350
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+202%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6300 and E-350

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

The Core 2 Duo E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E6300 and E-350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6300 versus 1.6 GHz on the E-350 — a 15.6% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6300. The Core 2 Duo E6300 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the E-350 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6300 scores 1,055 against the E-350's 1,049 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300E-350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.87 GHz+17%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K (per core)
Process
65 nm
40 nm-38%
Architecture
Conroe (2006−2007)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,055
1,049
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E6300 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E-350 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300E-350
Socket
LGA775
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core 2 Duo E6300) / not specified (E-350). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300E-350
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E6300 launched at $163 MSRP, while the E-350 debuted at $50. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo E6300 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6300 delivers 211.0 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the E-350 — making the Core 2 Duo E6300 the 100.4% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E6300E-350
MSRP
$163
$50-69%
Avg Price (30d)
$5-67%
$15
Performance per Dollar
211.0+202%
69.9
Release Date
2006
2011