A6-9220e
VS
Core 2 Duo E6300

A6-9220e vs Core 2 Duo E6300

AMD

A6-9220e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9220e is positioned at rank 930 and the Core 2 Duo E6300 is on rank 1058, so the A6-9220e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9220e

#918
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1667%
#919
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1643%
#920
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1508%
#921
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1501%
#922
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1487%
#924
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1436%
#925
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1377%
#926
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1375%
#927
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1338%
#930
A6-9220e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
48179%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
45524%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
33054%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9958%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6900%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3952%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3900%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3551%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3551%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3417%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3369%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3355%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3325%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
100%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
99%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
98%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
98%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
94%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
91%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
91%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
90%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
89%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
88%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
87%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
87%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
83%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
77%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9220e (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9220eCore 2 Duo E6300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6300 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9220eCore 2 Duo E6300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9220e and Core 2 Duo E6300

AMD

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6300

The Core 2 Duo E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Core 2 Duo E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 1.87 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6300 — a 24.8% clock advantage for the A6-9220e (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6300 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Core 2 Duo E6300's 1,055 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-9220e.

FeatureA6-9220eCore 2 Duo E6300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+28%
1.87 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.86 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,056
1,055
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6300 — the Core 2 Duo E6300 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6300 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E6300). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6300) — the Core 2 Duo E6300 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6300).

FeatureA6-9220eCore 2 Duo E6300
Socket
BGA
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
1066+26550%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / true (Core 2 Duo E6300). The A6-9220e includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Core 2 Duo E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6300 rivals Athlon 64 X2 3800+.

FeatureA6-9220eCore 2 Duo E6300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true