A6-9220e
VS
Athlon II X2 240

A6-9220e vs Athlon II X2 240

AMD

A6-9220e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 240

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9220e is positioned at rank 930 and the Athlon II X2 240 is on rank 852, so the Athlon II X2 240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9220e

#918
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1667%
#919
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1643%
#920
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1508%
#921
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1501%
#922
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1487%
#924
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1436%
#925
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1377%
#926
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1375%
#927
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1338%
#930
A6-9220e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 240

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17641%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16669%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12103%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3646%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2888%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2527%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1447%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1428%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1300%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1300%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1286%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1251%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1234%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1229%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1217%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
99%
#857
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
98%
#858
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
98%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
98%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
98%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
98%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
97%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
97%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
96%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
96%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9220e (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9220eAthlon II X2 240
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X2 240 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9220eAthlon II X2 240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9220e and Athlon II X2 240

AMD

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Athlon II X2 240

The Athlon II X2 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,060 points. Launch price was $35.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Athlon II X2 240 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 240 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Athlon II X2 240's 1,060 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X2 240.

FeatureA6-9220eAthlon II X2 240
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,056
1,060
Geekbench 6 Single
373
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 240 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II X2 240 — the A6-9220e supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 240 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Athlon II X2 240). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 16 (Athlon II X2 240) — the Athlon II X2 240 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X2 240).

FeatureA6-9220eAthlon II X2 240
Socket
BGA
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / AMD-V (Athlon II X2 240). The A6-9220e includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Athlon II X2 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 240 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240 rivals Pentium E5400.

FeatureA6-9220eAthlon II X2 240
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop