A6-9220e vs Athlon II X2 240

A6-9220e vs Athlon II X2 240 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220e

2 / 2

1,056

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X2 240

2 / 2

1,060

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220e vs Athlon II X2 240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220e vs Athlon II X2 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220e

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Athlon II X2 240 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,060).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240.

Athlon II X2 240

2009

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike A6-9220e.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A6-9220e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 240 better than A6-9220e?

Yes. Athlon II X2 240 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 240 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 240 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 240 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 240 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9220e vs Athlon II X2 240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II X2 240

The Athlon II X2 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,060 points. Launch price was $35.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Athlon II X2 240 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 240 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Athlon II X2 240's 1,060 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X2 240.

Feature	A6-9220e	Athlon II X2 240
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark	1,056	1,060
Geekbench 6 Single	—	373
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	700

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 240 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II X2 240 — the A6-9220e supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 240 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Athlon II X2 240). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 16 (Athlon II X2 240) — the Athlon II X2 240 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X2 240).

Feature	A6-9220e	Athlon II X2 240
Socket	BGA	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+100%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / AMD-V (Athlon II X2 240). The A6-9220e includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Athlon II X2 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 240 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240 rivals Pentium E5400.