A6-9220e vs Celeron N2820

A6-9220e vs Celeron N2820 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220e

2 / 2

1,056

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2820

2 / 2

1,061

+0.5%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220e vs Celeron N2820 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220e vs Celeron N2820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220e

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2820 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,061).

Celeron N2820

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 7W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2820 better than A6-9220e?

Yes. Celeron N2820 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2820 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2820 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2820 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2820 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9220e vs Celeron N2820 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron N2820

The Celeron N2820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,061 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Celeron N2820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 2.39 GHz on the Celeron N2820 — a 0.4% clock advantage for the A6-9220e (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N2820 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Celeron N2820's 1,061 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N2820.

Feature	A6-9220e	Celeron N2820
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.39 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.13 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,056	1,061
Geekbench 6 Single	—	220
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	400

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N2820 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2820 — the A6-9220e supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Celeron N2820). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 4 (Celeron N2820) — the A6-9220e offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and SoC (Celeron N2820).

Feature	A6-9220e	Celeron N2820
Socket	BGA	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+100%	DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+100%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / VT-x (Celeron N2820). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9220e) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2820 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2820 rivals AMD A6-6310.