A6-9220e vs Xeon 5110

A6-9220e vs Xeon 5110 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220e

2 / 2

1,056

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon 5110

2 / 2

1,055

0.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220e vs Xeon 5110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220e vs Xeon 5110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220e

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Xeon 5110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon 5110

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,056).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9220e better than Xeon 5110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A6-9220e is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-9220e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-9220e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9220e still makes the most sense overall. A6-9220e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9220e vs Xeon 5110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Xeon 5110

The Xeon 5110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $20.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Xeon 5110 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon 5110 — a 40% clock advantage for the A6-9220e (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon 5110 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Xeon 5110's 1,055 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-9220e.

Feature	A6-9220e	Xeon 5110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+50%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,056	1,055