A6-9220e
VS
Celeron B840

A6-9220e vs Celeron B840

AMD

A6-9220e

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Celeron B840

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9220e is positioned at rank 930 and the Celeron B840 is on rank 1028, so the A6-9220e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9220e

#918
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1667%
#919
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1643%
#920
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1508%
#921
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1501%
#922
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1487%
#924
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1436%
#925
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1377%
#926
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1375%
#927
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1338%
#930
A6-9220e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B840

#1016
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2370%
#1017
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2335%
#1018
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2144%
#1019
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2134%
#1020
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2115%
#1022
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2042%
#1023
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1958%
#1024
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1955%
#1025
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1902%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
93%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9220e (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9220eCeleron B840
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron B840 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9220eCeleron B840
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9220e and Celeron B840

AMD

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron B840

The Celeron B840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,065 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Celeron B840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron B840 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the A6-9220e (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron B840 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Celeron B840's 1,065 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron B840.

FeatureA6-9220eCeleron B840
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+26%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,056
1,065
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
790
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B840 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus 1333 on the Celeron B840 — the Celeron B840 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B840 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Celeron B840). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 16 (Celeron B840) — the Celeron B840 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Celeron B840).

FeatureA6-9220eCeleron B840
Socket
BGA
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
1333+33225%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / true (Celeron B840). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9220e) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B840 rivals Pentium B940.

FeatureA6-9220eCeleron B840
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R4
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Budget