A6-9220e vs Celeron B840

A6-9220e vs Celeron B840 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220e

2 / 2

1,056

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron B840

2 / 2

1,065

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220e vs Celeron B840 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220e vs Celeron B840: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220e

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,065).

Celeron B840

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while A6-9220e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9220e better than Celeron B840?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-9220e is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B840 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B840 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9220e is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-9220e comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B840 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (12.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220e makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-9220e vs Celeron B840 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220e

The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron B840

The Celeron B840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,065 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220e and Celeron B840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-9220e versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron B840 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the A6-9220e (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A6-9220e uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron B840 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Celeron B840's 1,065 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron B840.

Feature	A6-9220e	Celeron B840
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+26%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.9 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,056	1,065
Geekbench 6 Single	—	450
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	790

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B840 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A6-9220e versus 1333 on the Celeron B840 — the A6-9220e supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B840 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220e) vs 2 (Celeron B840). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220e) vs 16 (Celeron B840) — the Celeron B840 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220e) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Celeron B840).

Feature	A6-9220e	Celeron B840
Socket	BGA	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220e) / true (Celeron B840). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9220e) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B840) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B840 rivals Pentium B940.