A6-9220e
Celeron T1700
A6-9220e vs Celeron T1700 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-9220e vs Celeron T1700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-9220e vs Celeron T1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-9220e
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R4, while Celeron T1700 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,058).
Celeron T1700
2008Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A6-9220e mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron T1700 better than A6-9220e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-9220e vs Celeron T1700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A6-9220e
The A6-9220e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron T1700
The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A6-9220e is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the A6-9220e scores 1,056 against the Celeron T1700's 1,058 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron T1700.
| Feature | A6-9220e | Celeron T1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.83 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | — | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 1,056 | 1,058 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-9220e uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron T1700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A6-9220e | Celeron T1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The A6-9220e includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R4), while the Celeron T1700 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | A6-9220e | Celeron T1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon R4 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-9220e and Celeron T1700
