
Core 2 Duo E6420

Pentium Dual Core T4300
Core 2 Duo E6420 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E6420 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E6420 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E6420
2007Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium Dual Core T4300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($183 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Pentium Dual Core T4300
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $33 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,232 vs 1,235).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6420.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E6420 better than Pentium Dual Core T4300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E6420 vs Pentium Dual Core T4300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E6420
The Core 2 Duo E6420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,235 points. Launch price was $249.

Pentium Dual Core T4300
The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E6420 and Pentium Dual Core T4300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6420 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — a 1.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6420 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6420 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6420 scores 1,235 against the Pentium Dual Core T4300's 1,232 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6420. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6420 | Pentium Dual Core T4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.13 GHz+1% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.13 GHz+1% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 1,235 | 1,232 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6420 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6420 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — the Core 2 Duo E6420 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6420 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6420) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4300) — the Core 2 Duo E6420 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6420 | Pentium Dual Core T4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+33% | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6420) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300). Primary use case: Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6420 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5400+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6420 | Pentium Dual Core T4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | No VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E6420 was priced at $183, while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($183 vs $150), Pentium Dual Core T4300 was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6420 delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — making the Pentium Dual Core T4300 the 19.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6420 | Pentium Dual Core T4300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $183 | $150-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 8.2+22% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














