Core 2 Duo E7500 vs Core 2 Duo E4500
Core 2 Duo E7500
Core 2 Duo E4500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7500 is positioned at rank 992 and the Core 2 Duo E4500 is on rank 1017, so the Core 2 Duo E7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7500
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core 2 Duo E4500
Core 2 Duo E7500
The Core 2 Duo E7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,157 points. Launch price was $249.
Core 2 Duo E4500
The Core 2 Duo E4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,165 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core 2 Duo E4500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7500 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4500 — a 81.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4500 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7500 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4500 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7500 scores 1,157 against the Core 2 Duo E4500's 1,165 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.93 GHz | 2.2 GHz+137% |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz+33% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (total)+50% | 2 MB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Allendale (2006−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,157 | 1,165 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo E7500 versus 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4500 — the Core 2 Duo E4500 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E4500 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Core 2 Duo E7500) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4500).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 800+26567% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+52428700% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Core 2 Duo E7500) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4500). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4500 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4600+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | false |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E7500 launched at $113 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E4500 debuted at $133. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo E4500 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E7500 delivers 115.7 pts/$ vs 116.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E4500 — making the Core 2 Duo E4500 the 0.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7500 | Core 2 Duo E4500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $113-15% | $133 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.7 | 116.5 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E7500 and Core 2 Duo E4500
