Core 2 Duo E8335
VS
Athlon II X2 210e

Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Athlon II X2 210e

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 210e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8335 is positioned at rank 1196 and the Athlon II X2 210e is on rank 837, so the Athlon II X2 210e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5364%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5285%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4852%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4830%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4786%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4622%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4431%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4424%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4305%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
93%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
93%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
92%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
89%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 210e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17174%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16228%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11783%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3550%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2812%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2460%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1409%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1390%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1266%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1266%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1252%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1218%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1201%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1196%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1185%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
100%
#839
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
99%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
99%
#842
Athlon II X4 600e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#843
Core i7-4785T
MSRP: $306|Avg: $32
99%
#844
Core i5-6442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#845
Core i5-4690S
MSRP: $306|Avg: $189
99%
#846
Core i3-3250
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#847
Core i3-3240
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#848
Pentium G640T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
98%
#849
Core i7-5930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $410
98%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
98%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X2 210e leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo E8335 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8335Athlon II X2 210e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($28)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X2 210e stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 44% cheaper ($28 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8335Athlon II X2 210e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+78%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($28)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8335 and Athlon II X2 210e

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Athlon II X2 210e

The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8335 and Athlon II X2 210e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e — a 94.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e (base: 2.933 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8335 scores 1,094 against the Athlon II X2 210e's 1,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Athlon II X2 210e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.93 GHz
2.6 GHz+180%
Base Clock
2.933 GHz+13%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,094
1,089
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Athlon II X2 210e
Socket
P
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335) / true (Athlon II X2 210e). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Athlon II X2 210e
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E8335 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 210e debuted at $60. At current prices ($50 vs $28), the Athlon II X2 210e is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8335 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 38.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 210e — making the Athlon II X2 210e the 56% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP
$200
$60-70%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$28-44%
Performance per Dollar
21.9
38.9+78%
Release Date
2009
2010