
Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Athlon II X2 210e

Core 2 Duo E8335

Athlon II X2 210e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8335 is positioned at rank 1196 and the Athlon II X2 210e is on rank 837, so the Athlon II X2 210e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 210e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($28) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+78%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) | ✅ More affordable ($28) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8335 and Athlon II X2 210e

Core 2 Duo E8335
The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

Athlon II X2 210e
The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E8335 and Athlon II X2 210e share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e — a 94.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e (base: 2.933 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8335 scores 1,094 against the Athlon II X2 210e's 1,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.93 GHz | 2.6 GHz+180% |
| Base Clock | 2.933 GHz+13% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+1100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,094 | 1,089 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335) / true (Athlon II X2 210e). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E8335 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 210e debuted at $60. At current prices ($50 vs $28), the Athlon II X2 210e is $22 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8335 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 38.9 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 210e — making the Athlon II X2 210e the 56% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Athlon II X2 210e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $60-70% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $28-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 38.9+78% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















