Core 2 Duo E8335
VS
Core 2 Duo E4400

Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Core 2 Duo E4400

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.93 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E8335 is positioned at rank 1196 and the Core 2 Duo E4400 is on rank 1001, so the Core 2 Duo E4400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8335

#1184
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5364%
#1185
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5285%
#1186
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4852%
#1187
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4830%
#1188
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4786%
#1190
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4622%
#1191
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4431%
#1192
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4424%
#1193
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4305%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
98%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
93%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
93%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
92%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
91%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
89%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
89%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
32169%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
30396%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
22070%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6649%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5267%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4607%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2639%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2604%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2371%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2371%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2345%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2281%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2249%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2240%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2220%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
100%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
98%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
97%
#1004
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
96%
#1005
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
96%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
96%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
95%
#1009
Core 2 Duo E6540
MSRP: $163|Avg: $15
95%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
94%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
93%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
93%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
93%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
92%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E4400 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo E8335 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8335Core 2 Duo E4400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E4400 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 60% cheaper ($20 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore 2 Duo E8335Core 2 Duo E4400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+150%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E8335 and Core 2 Duo E4400

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8335

The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4400

The Core 2 Duo E4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,095 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8335 and Core 2 Duo E4400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 versus 2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4400 — a 73% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4400 (base: 2.933 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4400 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8335 scores 1,094 against the Core 2 Duo E4400's 1,095 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4400.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Core 2 Duo E4400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.93 GHz
2 GHz+115%
Base Clock
2.933 GHz+47%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,094
1,095
Geekbench 6 Single
208
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E4400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Core 2 Duo E4400
Socket
P
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335) / None (Core 2 Duo E4400). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E4400 rivals Athlon II X2 240.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Core 2 Duo E4400
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Duo E8335 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E4400 debuted at $113. At current prices ($50 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo E4400 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8335 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 54.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E4400 — making the Core 2 Duo E4400 the 85.8% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8335Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP
$200
$113-44%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$20-60%
Performance per Dollar
21.9
54.8+150%
Release Date
2009
2007