Core 2 Duo P8600
VS
Core i3-7102E

Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i3-7102E

Intel

Core 2 Duo P8600

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-7102E

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo P8600 is positioned at rank 160 and the Core i3-7102E is on rank 974, so the Core 2 Duo P8600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8600

#148
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
336%
#149
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
331%
#150
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
304%
#151
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
303%
#152
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
300%
#154
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
290%
#155
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
278%
#156
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
277%
#157
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
270%
#160
Core 2 Duo P8600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Celeron N3060
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7102E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26988%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
25501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18516%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5578%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4418%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3865%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2214%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2185%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1989%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1989%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1967%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1914%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1887%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1880%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1863%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
100%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
98%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
95%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
95%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#981
Core i5-2405S
MSRP: $309|Avg: $120
95%
#982
Celeron 420
MSRP: $39|Avg: $15
94%
#983
Athlon II X4 615e
MSRP: $186|Avg: $30
94%
#984
Athlon X2 BE-2350
MSRP: $90|Avg: $10
94%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
93%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
92%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
91%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
91%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7102E (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Duo P8600Core i3-7102E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo P8600 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Duo P8600Core i3-7102E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo P8600 and Core i3-7102E

Intel

Core 2 Duo P8600

The Core 2 Duo P8600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $209.

Intel

Core i3-7102E

The Core i3-7102E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,599 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P8600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-7102E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8600 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-7102E — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8600. The Core 2 Duo P8600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-7102E uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8600 scores 2,618 against the Core i3-7102E's 2,599 — a 0.7% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8600. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8600 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7102E.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8600Core i3-7102E
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB L2 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+500%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,618
2,599
Cinebench R23 Multi
659
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8600 versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7102E — the Core i3-7102E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7102E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8600) and Intel 100 Series,Intel 200 Series (Core i3-7102E).

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8600Core i3-7102E
Socket
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
64 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo P8600) vs Yes (Core i3-7102E). The Core i3-7102E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Core 2 Duo P8600 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8600Core i3-7102E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Yes