
Core 2 Duo P8600

Core i5-7Y54
Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y54 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y54 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y54: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo P8600
2008Why buy it
- β +1.2% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 3W instead of 5W, a 2W reduction.
- β 60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-7Y54 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-7Y54
2016Why buy it
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 615, while Core 2 Duo P8600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,586 vs 2,618).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P8600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β50% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 3W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7Y54 better than Core 2 Duo P8600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y54 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P8600
The Core 2 Duo P8600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $209.

Core i5-7Y54
The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016β2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo P8600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-7Y54's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8600 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 β a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y54 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8600 uses the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses Kaby Lake (2016β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8600 scores 2,618 against the Core i5-7Y54's 2,586 β a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8600. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8600 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y54.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8600 | Core i5-7Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+100% | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008β2011) | Kaby Lake (2016β2019) |
| PassMark | 2,618+1% | 2,586 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo P8600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-7Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8600 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y54 β the Core i5-7Y54 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7Y54 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo P8600) vs 10 (Core i5-7Y54) β the Core 2 Duo P8600 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8600) and SoC (Core i5-7Y54).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8600 | Core i5-7Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | LPDDR3-1866+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo P8600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54). The Core i5-7Y54 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 615), while the Core 2 Duo P8600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P8600 | Core i5-7Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | β | Tablet/2-in-1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













