Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y57

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y57 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y57: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P8600

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 5W, a 2W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-7Y57 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-7Y57

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 615, while Core 2 Duo P8600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,585 vs 2,618).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P8600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌50% higher power demand at 4.5W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7Y57 better than Core 2 Duo P8600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-7Y57 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8600 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i5-7Y57 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7Y57 is the better buy right now. Core i5-7Y57 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo P8600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7Y57 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Core i5-7Y57 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P8600

The Core 2 Duo P8600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $209.

Core i5-7Y57

The Core i5-7Y57 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,585 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo P8600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-7Y57's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8600 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-7Y57 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y57 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P8600 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8600 scores 2,618 against the Core i5-7Y57's 2,585 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8600. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8600 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7Y57.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8600	Core i5-7Y57
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.3 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+100%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB L2 Cache	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,618+1%	2,585

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P8600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-7Y57 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8600 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y57 — the Core i5-7Y57 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7Y57 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo P8600) vs 12 (Core i5-7Y57) — the Core 2 Duo P8600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core 2 Duo P8600	Core i5-7Y57
Socket	PGA478	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	LPDDR3-1866+75%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo P8600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-7Y57). The Core i5-7Y57 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 615), while the Core 2 Duo P8600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y57 targets Mobile.