
Core 2 Duo P9500

Core i3-4130T
Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Core i3-4130T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Core i3-4130T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Core i3-4130T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo P9500
2008Why buy it
- β +0.9% higher PassMark.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- β Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4130T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i3-4130T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130T.
Core i3-4130T
2013Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core 2 Duo P9500 needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo P9500.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (2,876 vs 2,901).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $124 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P9500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4130T better than Core 2 Duo P9500?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Core i3-4130T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P9500
The Core 2 Duo P9500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,901 points. Launch price was $348.

Core i3-4130T
The Core i3-4130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013β2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,876 points. Launch price was $270.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo P9500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4130T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P9500 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4130T β a 13.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-4130T (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P9500 uses the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-4130T uses Haswell (2013β2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P9500 scores 2,901 against the Core i3-4130T's 2,876 β a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo P9500. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 340 vs 890, a 89.4% lead for the Core i3-4130T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P9500 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4130T.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9500 | Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.53 GHz | 2.9 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.53 GHz | 2.9 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+100% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+2300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008β2011) | Haswell (2013β2015) |
| PassMark | 2,901 | 2,876 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 340 | 890+162% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 650 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo P9500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-4130T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo P9500 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4130T β the Core i3-4130T supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4130T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: PM45,GM45 (Core 2 Duo P9500) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130T).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9500 | Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo P9500) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4130T). The Core i3-4130T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core 2 Duo P9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo P9500 targets Budget, Core i3-4130T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P9500 rivals Athlon II X2 245e; Core i3-4130T rivals A8-7600.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9500 | Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Low Power Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













