Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core 2 Duo P9500

Intel

Core 2 Duo P8800

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P9500

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core 2 Duo P9500 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core 2 Duo P9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core 2 Duo P9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

  • Draws 3W instead of 6W, a 3W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).

Core 2 Duo P9500

2008

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,901 vs 2,932).
  • 100% higher power demand at 6W vs 3W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P8800 better than Core 2 Duo P9500?
Yes. Core 2 Duo P8800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo P8800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 2 Duo P8800 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo P8800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo P8800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Core 2 Duo P9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P9500

The Core 2 Duo P9500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,901 points. Launch price was $348.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo P8800 and Core 2 Duo P9500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P9500 — a 5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8800 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P8800 scores 2,932 against the Core 2 Duo P9500's 2,901 — a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8800. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P9500.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8800Core 2 Duo P9500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+5%
2.53 GHz
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+5%
2.53 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB L2 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+100%
L2 Cache
3 MB
6 MB+100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,932+1%
2,901
Geekbench 6 Single
340
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8800Core 2 Duo P9500
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo P8800) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo P9500). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo P9500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P9500 rivals Athlon II X2 245e.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P8800Core 2 Duo P9500
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget