Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core 2 Duo P8800

Intel

Atom x5-Z8300

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 1.84 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P8800

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core 2 Duo P8800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core 2 Duo P8800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-Z8300

2015

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Core 2 Duo P8800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $20 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P8800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom x5-Z8300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,932 vs 2,934).
    • No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-Z8300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom x5-Z8300 better than Core 2 Duo P8800?
    Yes. Atom x5-Z8300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Atom x5-Z8300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-Z8300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom x5-Z8300 is the better buy right now. Atom x5-Z8300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $20 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (146.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom x5-Z8300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom x5-Z8300

    The Atom x5-Z8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.84 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,934 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core 2 Duo P8800

    The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

    Processing Power

    The Atom x5-Z8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom x5-Z8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.84 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8300 versus 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8800 (base: 1.44 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8300 scores 2,934 against the Core 2 Duo P8800's 2,932 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom x5-Z8300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8300 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800.

    FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core 2 Duo P8800
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.84 GHz
    2.66 GHz+45%
    Base Clock
    1.44 GHz
    2.66 GHz+85%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    3 MB L2 Cache
    L2 Cache
    2 MB
    3 MB+50%
    Process
    14 nm-69%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
    Penryn (2008−2011)
    PassMark
    2,934
    2,932
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core 2 Duo P8800
    Socket
    UTFCBGA592
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+173%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3L-RS 1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    1
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    The Atom x5-Z8300 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core 2 Duo P8800
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)