Atom x5-Z8300
VS
Core i5-4300M

Atom x5-Z8300 vs Core i5-4300M

Intel

Atom x5-Z8300

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 1.84 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i5-4300M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x5-Z8300 is positioned at rank 4 and the Core i5-4300M is on rank 1017, so the Atom x5-Z8300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8300

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
100%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
99%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
90%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
90%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
89%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
86%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
83%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
82%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
80%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
74%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
73%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4300M

#1005
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2250%
#1006
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2217%
#1007
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2035%
#1008
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2026%
#1009
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2008%
#1011
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1939%
#1012
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1859%
#1013
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1856%
#1014
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1806%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
100%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
97%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4300M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom x5-Z8300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom x5-Z8300Core i5-4300M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($227)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Atom x5-Z8300 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $20 (vs $227), it costs 91% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 1025% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-4300M.
InsightAtom x5-Z8300Core i5-4300M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1025%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️ Higher cost ($227)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom x5-Z8300 and Core i5-4300M

Intel

Atom x5-Z8300

The Atom x5-Z8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.84 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,934 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-4300M

The Core i5-4300M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,960 points. Launch price was $227.

Processing Power

The Atom x5-Z8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4300M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.84 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8300 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4300M — a 56.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4300M (base: 1.44 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-4300M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8300 scores 2,934 against the Core i5-4300M's 2,960 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-4300M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8300 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4300M.

FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core i5-4300M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.84 GHz
3.3 GHz+79%
Base Clock
1.44 GHz
2.6 GHz+81%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,934
2,960
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4300M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core i5-4300M
Socket
UTFCBGA592
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-RS 1600
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
1
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x5-Z8300 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Core i5-4300M requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core i5-4300M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
💰

Value Analysis

The Atom x5-Z8300 launched at $20 MSRP, while the Core i5-4300M debuted at $227.

FeatureAtom x5-Z8300Core i5-4300M
MSRP
$20-91%
$227
Release Date
2015
2013