
Atom x5-Z8300

Xeon W3520
Atom x5-Z8300 vs Xeon W3520 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x5-Z8300 vs Xeon W3520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x5-Z8300 vs Xeon W3520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x5-Z8300
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $264 less on MSRP ($20 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1317.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 146.7 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($20 MSRP vs $284 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), while Xeon W3520 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W3520 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,934 vs 2,940).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W3520, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon W3520
2009Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 146.7 PassMark/$ ($284 MSRP vs $20 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-Z8300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W3520 better than Atom x5-Z8300?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x5-Z8300 vs Xeon W3520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-Z8300
The Atom x5-Z8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.84 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,934 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon W3520
The Xeon W3520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,940 points. Launch price was $404.
Processing Power
The Atom x5-Z8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3520's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.84 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8300 versus 2.93 GHz on the Xeon W3520 — a 45.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W3520 (base: 1.44 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3520 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8300 scores 2,934 against the Xeon W3520's 2,940 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon W3520. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8300 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3520.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1.84 GHz | 2.93 GHz+59% |
| Base Clock | 1.44 GHz | 2.66 GHz+85% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) | Bloomfield (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,934 | 2,940 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3520 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-RS 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 1 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom x5-Z8300 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Xeon W3520 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom x5-Z8300 was priced at $20, while the Xeon W3520 came in at $284. On launch pricing ($20 vs $284), Atom x5-Z8300 was $264 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x5-Z8300 delivers 146.7 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W3520 — making the Atom x5-Z8300 the 173.6% better value option.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon W3520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $20-93% | $284 |
| Performance per Dollar | 146.7+1311% | 10.4 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














