
Atom x5-Z8300 vs Xeon X3460

Atom x5-Z8300

Xeon X3460
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom x5-Z8300 is positioned at rank 4 and the Xeon X3460 is on rank 886, so the Atom x5-Z8300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8300
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3460
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+24%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x5-Z8300 and Xeon X3460

Atom x5-Z8300
The Atom x5-Z8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 1.84 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,934 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3460
The Xeon X3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,955 points. Launch price was $316.
Processing Power
The Atom x5-Z8300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X3460's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.84 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8300 versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X3460 — a 61.1% clock advantage for the Xeon X3460 (base: 1.44 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X3460 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-Z8300 scores 2,934 against the Xeon X3460's 2,955 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon X3460. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-Z8300 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3460.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1.84 GHz | 3.46 GHz+88% |
| Base Clock | 1.44 GHz | 2.8 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) | Lynnfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,934 | 2,955 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x5-Z8300 uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3460 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA592 | LGA1156 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-RS 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 1 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom x5-Z8300 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)), while the Xeon X3460 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | — |
Value Analysis
The Atom x5-Z8300 launched at $20 MSRP, while the Xeon X3460 debuted at $316.
| Feature | Atom x5-Z8300 | Xeon X3460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $20-94% | $316 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














