Celeron N2910 vs Core 2 Duo P8800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2910 vs Core 2 Duo P8800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2910 vs Core 2 Duo P8800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo P8800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,907 vs 2,932).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 7W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P8800

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 7W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2910 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo P8800 better than Celeron N2910?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2910 is ahead with a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo P8800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo P8800 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo P8800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2910 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2910 vs Core 2 Duo P8800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo P8800

The Core 2 Duo P8800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,932 points. Launch price was $241.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N2910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8800 — a 49.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P8800 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Core 2 Duo P8800's 2,932 — a 0.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8800.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core 2 Duo P8800
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+66%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+66%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+16967%	3 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,907	2,932
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core 2 Duo P8800
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2910) / not specified (Core 2 Duo P8800). The Celeron N2910 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo P8800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210.