Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-10100Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-10100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-10100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core i3-10100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,907 vs 2,918).

Core i3-10100Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2910 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10100Y better than Celeron N2910?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2910 is ahead with a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10100Y pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-10100Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-10100Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-10100Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-10100Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-10100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-10100Y

The Core i3-10100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,918 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-10100Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10100Y — a 83.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100Y (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-10100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Core i3-10100Y's 2,918 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-10100Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 4 MB on the Core i3-10100Y.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i3-10100Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+144%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,907	2,918
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-10100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i3-10100Y
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2910) / not specified (Core i3-10100Y). The Celeron N2910 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core i3-10100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210.