Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-4210M

Intel

Celeron N2910

4 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4210M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-4210M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-4210M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-4210M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-4210M

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,899 vs 2,907).
  • 7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2910 better than Core i5-4210M?
Yes. Celeron N2910 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2910 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2910 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron N2910 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2910 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4210M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-4210M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-4210M

The Core i5-4210M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,899 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4210M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-4210M — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-4210M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4210M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Core i5-4210M's 2,899 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N2910. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 959, a 128.1% lead for the Core i5-4210M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210M.

FeatureCeleron N2910Core i5-4210M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz+100%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,907
2,899
Geekbench 6 Single
210
959+357%
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4210M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4210M — the Core i5-4210M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4210M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2910) vs 16 (Core i5-4210M) — the Core i5-4210M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2910) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210M).

FeatureCeleron N2910Core i5-4210M
Socket
FCBGA1170
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
DDR3L-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2910) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4210M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop, Core i5-4210M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210; Core i5-4210M rivals A10-5750M.

FeatureCeleron N2910Core i5-4210M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Mainstream Laptop