Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3380M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3380M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3380M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (210 vs 700).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (700 vs 1,600).

Core i5-3380M

2013

Why buy it

✅+233.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3380M better than Celeron N2910?

Yes. Core i5-3380M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 128.6% better Geekbench multi-core, and 1.1% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3380M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3380M is the stronger fit. You are getting 128.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3380M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3380M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3380M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3380M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3380M

The Core i5-3380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,938 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3380M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3380M — a 76.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-3380M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-3380M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Core i5-3380M's 2,938 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-3380M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 700, a 107.7% lead for the Core i5-3380M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 700 vs 1,600 (78.3% advantage for the Core i5-3380M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3380M.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i5-3380M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+125%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,907	2,938+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	210	700+233%
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	1,600+129%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3380M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3380M — the Core i5-3380M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3380M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2910) vs 16 (Core i5-3380M) — the Core i5-3380M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2910) and HM77,QM77 (Core i5-3380M).

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i5-3380M
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2910) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3380M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3380M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop, Core i5-3380M targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210; Core i5-3380M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i5-3380M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Business Laptop